 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Redlands v. County of San Bernardino, No. E028515, No. E028540.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The County of San Bernardino, California, erred in its adoption of a negative declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act concerning modification of its land use; the County failed to adequately consider future development.
|
|||||
| Paul v. Friedman, No. B142814.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 29, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Anti-SLAPP statute did not protect attorney from liability for torts committed in investigating securities broker's personal life, where personal issues had no relevance to arbitration of client complaints against broker.
|
|||||
| Kajima Eng'g & Constr. v. City of L.A., No. B149642.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a suit brought by a construction company against the City of Los Angeles, California, a SLAPP motion was defeated, as alleged improper conduct did not arise from the company's free speech activities, but rather from its contracting practices.
|
|||||
| Kids' Universe v. In2labs, No. B147455.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was proper in a breach of contract action to recover lost profits; because of the speculative nature of the evidence, plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of material fact as to the ability to prove lost profits.
|
|||||
| People v. Smith, No. C037999.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An associate of a probationer assumed the ongoing risk that her property and effects in common areas of the probationer's residence were subject to search.
|
|||||
| People v. Toney, C035564,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because state failed to secure first of their alternatives, an appeal to the appellate court, and utilized remaining alternative by filing a second complaint, they exhausted their alternative remedies to relitigate or seek review of dismissal.
|
|||||
| Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., E028602,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 30, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the case of multiple insurers, the appellate court gave effect to the duty-to-defend provisions of every excess insurers' policy.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
