Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - January 26, 2007

  
Capital Research & Management Co. v. Brown, B189249, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: California Attorney General's suit was not preempted because National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996's savings clause, 15 U.S.C. ? 77r(c)(1), gave him authority to bring enforcement action against covered security's investment advisor and wholesale broker-dealer who allegedly made inaccurate or inadequate representations to purchasers.

Search Cases for Free

  
Dutra v. Eagleson, B183033, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Gilbert v. Sykes, C050766, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a medical malpractice action, a plastic surgeon's cross-complaint for defamation should have been struck under the anti-SLAPP statute, Code Civ. Proc., ? 425.16, because the surgeon was a limited purpose public figure and he failed to show that statements on the patient's Web site were both false and published with actual malice.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Price, A111081, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a petition to extend defendant's commitment in a psychiatric hospital was not filed at least 90 days before its expiration as required by Pen. Code, ? 1026.5, subd. (b)(2), defendant was not given adequate time to prepare for trial. Thus, defendant's due process rights were violated.

Search Cases for Free

  
Perez v. Roe, B182814, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Williams v. Superior Court, D048962, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 26, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a wrongful death action on behalf of a decedent's minor children, there was no error in appointing the children's maternal grandmother as guardian ad litem under Code Civ. Proc., ? 372, because the father, who had a conflict of interest, did not have constitutional right to select the guardian ad litem, even if he preferred his own parents.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top