Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - California - January 20, 2005
	SHELBURNE v. 21ST CENTURY INS. CO., B168059, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 20, 2005, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	San Francisco Fire Fighters Local 798 v. City & County of San Francisco, A104822, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 20, 2005, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Application of a deferential standard of review in denying a union's mandamus petition to compel a city to arbitrate a bargaining impasse was error; because a finding of necessity permitted acts outside the city's ordinary powers, review was de novo. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State of California ex rel. Harris v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, A095918, A097793, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 20, 2005, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Borrowers who paid interest on lender funds deposited in escrow were entitled to spread that an escrow agent received under arbitrage arrangements because spread was interest accruing on escrow deposits and the borrowers were persons in interest. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., B176546, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 20, 2005, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Even if the insurance company had no authority to maintain its statutory unfair competition claims in superior court, it was sufficiently aggrieved by the dismissal of its complaint that it had standing to appeal. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.