 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| PEOPLE v. WRIGHT, B156478,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. YARMOLYUK, C038396,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PRADO v. DAMATO, A094913 & A097069,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Dale, H024067,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in finding "not true" an allegation that defendant suffered a prior "strike" in another county; trial court was not bound to regard magistrate's finding as an adjudication of the truth of the matters testified to by victim.
|
|||||
| People v. Fonseca, No. F039525.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 21, 2003, Decided , January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an unjoined co-perpetrator testified at trial, the court held that there was no error in giving jurors an instruction informing them not to speculate as to the fate of a party not being prosecuted.
|
|||||
| People v. Franklin, No. F039208.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 21, 2003, Decided , January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly committed defendant as a sexually violent predator because defendant's former rape conviction qualified as a sexually violent offense that supported such a commitment.
|
|||||
| RASMUSSEN v. PLUMMER, H023351,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| ROYAL CANADIAN MUT. INVS. v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., B156918,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Roberts v. Los Angeles County Bar Assn., No. B150039.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 21, 2003, Decided , January 21, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Anti-SLAPP statute applied and denial of motion to strike was error; the lawsuit arose from the bar association's exercise of its right of free speech in connection with a public issue when it rated the judicial candidate as not qualified.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
