 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Estate of Justesen, No. B126411.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, December 30, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Unreasonable delay by personal representative and probate court resulted in beneficiary dying before distribution of the estate. Court held unreasonable delay in administration should not defeat beneficiary's interest.
|
|||||
| People v. Anderson, G021627,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, December 30, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Second degree murder conviction was improper because the failure by the defendant to care for her child did not constitute malice; proof of malice was required for a second degree murder conviction.
|
|||||
| Ray v. Valley Forge Ins. Co., No. B129058.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, December 30, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff was insured under commercial general liability policy only against certain, limited claims occurring when he conducted business, and he was not covered for errors or omissions in giving professional advice.
|
|||||
| Samuels v. Mix, No. S070599.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, December 30, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In legal malpractice actions, the attorney or legal firm bears the burden to prove plaintiff failed to commence a cause of action within the time period allowed by the statute of limitations.
|
|||||
| Schreiber v. Estate of Kiser, No. S075914.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, December 30, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in precluding plaintiff's treating physicians, who had been designated as expert witnesses, from opining that plaintiff's injuries were caused by accident.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
