 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hicks v. Superior Court, B167843,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As implied warranty disclaimers were conspicuous, and there was no evidence of either procedural or substantive unconscionability by the developer, the trial court properly granted summary adjudication in favor of the developer.
|
|||||
| Hicks v. Superior Court, No. B167843,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re BRITTANY W., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, D042733,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re JAMES I., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, D042349,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re KUNKLER, B159884,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re M.R., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, D042616,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Chakko, B166116,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a child support proceeding, an issue sanction properly declared the father's monthly income to be $ 40,000 per month based on a mortgage loan application that a loan broker completed with some of the same documents that father failed to produce.
|
|||||
| In re SINGER, H025790,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re the Marriage of CHING and MICHAEL BAYS. CHING BAYS, Respondent, v. MICHAEL BAYS, Appellant., H025487,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 22, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
