 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Alliance for Children's Rights v. L.A. County Dep't of Children, No. B146391.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly required county's department of children and family services to submit each waiver of a social worker visit of a child declared a court ward to the dependency court judge supervising the ward for approval.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Sachs, No. B146651.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ex-wife could obtain copy of ex-husband's income tax returns and examine him about their contents at judgment debtor examination despite his claims that financial information could incriminate him on contempt charges for failure to pay support.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Clauser/Wells P'ship, No. D038190.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an eminent domain action against Caltrans, the trial court erred by excluding expert testimony as to the fair market value of business inventory condemned.
|
|||||
| People v. Como, No. C032966.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a criminal case, an instruction that required jury to accept and apply the law as the judge stated it did not improperly prohibit jury nullification; instruction accurately stated a fundamental and historic precept of California's judicial system.
|
|||||
| People v. Floyd, F037295,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Definition of the term "conviction" as used in a proposition measure enacted by California's voters did not include cases in which sentence was pronounced prior to July 1, 2001, and from which appeal was taken.
|
|||||
| People v. Haselman, F035862,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 1, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sexual assault conviction was upheld, as jury was not erroneously instructed regarding uncharged misconduct, as any confusion or misapprehension was more than adequately corrected, explained, or dispelled by accompanying instructions.
|
|||||
| Snapp & Assocs. Ins. Servs. v. Robertson, No. D036202.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 1, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Action for conversion and related claims was time-barred, where one broker knew of potential claims against the other broker for retention of commissions on accounts more than four years before the complaint was filed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
