Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - January 24, 2005

  
G-TECH USA v. ALAGEM, B167716, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
INTERQUEST CORP. v. SHUWA INVS. CORP., B175799, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Dannenberg, S111029, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court of appeal erred in holding that parole board had to set fixed date for parole release unless crime was particularly egregious compared to other offenses of the same class. Board only had to consider dangerous implications of crime individually.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re I.G., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, A105340, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
In re J.L., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, C050412, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
In re SHACHAR, D042346, D043648, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
LLP MORTG. v. BIZAR, B172072, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
LPP Mortgage, Ltd. v. Bizar, B172072, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A mortgage company, as the assignee of a promissory note made to the United States Small Business Administration, was entitled to use the federal statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C.S. ??2451(a), in pursuing its action against the borrowers to collect on a promissory note; the action was timely and the company was entitled to summary judgment.

Search Cases for Free

  
MADERA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASS'N v. MADERA COUNTY CIV. SERV. COMM'N, F045077, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
MORRISON v. PRUNTY, D043566, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top