 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Amelco Elec. v. City of Thousand Oaks, No. S091069.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, February 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a suit brought by a lighting company alleging breach of a public works contract, the theory of abandonment did not apply to a public entity who made 248 changes affecting the electrical cost.
|
|||||
| County of Orange v. Smith, No. G026359.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Child support order entered by commissioner, regarded as temporary judge, after father failed to object to his appointment, was affirmed. 13 year delay in enforcing child support obligation did not unduly prejudice father.
|
|||||
| Crook v. Contreras, No. H021933, No. H021934.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The documents were not valid as codicils because they were not signed by both witnesses prior to decedent's death; and the documents were not valid as trust amendments because the decedent did not have the power to amend the trust.
|
|||||
| Fisher v. Allis-Chalmers Corp. Prod. Liab. Trust, No. F035149.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Record showed that purported successor in interest agreed to assume liabilities arising from or relating to conduct of business of joint venture's electrical products group and did not show that widow's claim was excluded from assumption.
|
|||||
| Hartwell Corp. v. Superior Court, No. S082782.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, February 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State agency's regulation of water quality and safety did not preempt damage claims alleging violations of federal and state drinking water standards against regulated water providers, but remaining claims against these providers were preempted.
|
|||||
| People v. Hearn, F034832,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 4, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The defendant's convictions and sentence were affirmed because the term "major participant" was not unconstitutionally vague and did not render the penal sentencing statute unconstitutional.
|
|||||
| People v. Nolan, No. B149669.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, February 4, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly revoked defendant's probation for violating drug condition where her urine sample tested positive for drugs, and the test was conducted by qualified personnel on an accepted machine.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
