|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - February 18, 2009
|
| |
D.B. v. Superior Court, A123439,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, February 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Juvenile court properly denied reunification services pursuant to Welf. & Inst. Code, ? 361.5, subd. (b)(13), based on father's history of drug use and his failure to comply with court-ordered treatment. Section 361.5, subd. (b)(13)'s reference to "court-ordered treatment" was construed to include treatment ordered as a condition of parole.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Roodenburg v. Pavestone Co., L.P., C055116,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a case determining how much one party would have to pay to buy out another party's interest in their limited liability company, the uncertainty in the amount of damages did not bar prejudgment interest because Civ. Code, ? 3287, subd. (a), did not apply where prejudgment interest was part of the contractual amount owed.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback