 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| PEOPLE v. LYONS, G032730,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. MORRIS, A104650, A106442,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. PASSER, A107296,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. PERALES, F044346,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. THOMAS, B170422,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. THOMPSON, E036368,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS, B171473,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. WOOLLEY, B169388,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Gonzalez, S122240,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant's statement to police was ambiguous and equivocal, the police were not required to ask clarifying questions to determine defendant's intent, and the statement was not a sufficiently clear request for counsel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
