Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - January 24, 2005

  
PEOPLE v. LOWE, H026889, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. LYONS, G032730, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. MORRIS, A104650, A106442, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. PASSER, A107296, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. PERALES, F044346, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. THOMAS, B170422, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. THOMPSON, E036368, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS, B171473, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. WOOLLEY, B169388, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Gonzalez, S122240, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 24, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because defendant's statement to police was ambiguous and equivocal, the police were not required to ask clarifying questions to determine defendant's intent, and the statement was not a sufficiently clear request for counsel.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top