 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Collins, B160390,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an unclothed body search of defendant was reasonable and did not affront defendant's personal sense of dignity, the search was reasonable and constitutional and the trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress.
|
|||||
| People v. Myles, B158774,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Wandick, C040921,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's commission of a non-drug felony while awaiting trial on his drug charge took him out of the class of nonviolent substance abusers for whom the voters intended rehabilitative treatment when they passed Proposition 36.
|
|||||
| RAMIREZ v. AXXIS NETWORK & TELCOMS., B165790,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| RIALTO POCKETS, INC. v. EL POLLO LOCO, INC., B165903,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| ROBERT P. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, B170026,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Roth v. L.A. Door Co., G031221,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly ruled that an employer's complaint in intervention arising out of an employee's work-related injuries was barred, because the employer was self-insured. The claim was excluded as a covered claim.
|
|||||
| SEIGOSO v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, B161580,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| SMITH v. LUIPPOLD, G031366,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 23, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
