 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gulf Ins. Co. v. Berger, No. B128560.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Signed defense guidelines and correspondence reflected an agreement between the parties and an attorney-client relationship as a matter of law. No disqualifying conflict of interest existed to prevent appellant's suit.
|
|||||
| In re Rashad H., No. B133778.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, February 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because father was denied notice of hearing terminating parental rights, reversal would advance prospective adoptive parents' rights and public trust, and no evidence showed settlement was an option, order was reversed.
|
|||||
| Knb Enters. v. Matthews, No. B127931.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a human likeness was not copyrightable, the models' claims against the unauthorized publisher of their photographs were not the equivalent of a copyright infringement and were not preempted by federal copyright law.
|
|||||
| People v. Clem, No. A082187.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, February 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because felony murder jury instruction was properly given, since discharging firearm in a grossly negligent manner which could result in injury or death fell within felony murder rule, defendant's murder conviction affirmed.
|
|||||
| People v. Culuko, No. E020267.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In child murder case, jury was properly instructed, and instructions did not permit jury to find defendants guilty of murder without necessary finding of malice.
|
|||||
| People v. Hester, No. S077187.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, February 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant agreed to a specified prison term and did not raise objection to the multiple punishment at sentencing hearing, defendant waived right to claim that his sentence violated the multiple punishment statute.
|
|||||
| Tellis v. Contractors' State License Bd., No. E023997.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Contractor who had received full payment for building home was obligated to repair substandard defects; administrative board did not abuse its discretion in issuing a citation against him.
|
|||||
| Wm. R. Clarke Corp. v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., No. B123956.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 17, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order for judgment creditor against appeal bond for balance was affirmed as equitable, and not an abuse of court's discretion; judgment debtor erred in assessing post-judgment interest after deducting offset from principal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
