Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - California - February 5 - February 6, 2002
	Gemini Aluminum Corp. v. Cal. Custom Shapes, No. D038611., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 5, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Trial court did not err by instructing jury that contractor, which sued subcontractor for intentionally interfering with contractor's prospective economic advantage, had burden of proving subcontractor committed separate tort of misappropriation. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Badura, No. E028780., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 5, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Defendant was not prejudiced by three day delay in the holding of his probable cause hearing for commitment as a sexual predator where he was incarcerated during that period. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Espinoza, No. H021384, No. H022532., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 5, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Defendant's right to present a defense was not denied where court excluded expert testimony in defendant's sexual assault prosecution where proffered evidence of victim's emotional problems was speculative and had little probative value. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Montaque, B149225, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, February 5, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Murder conviction was not reversed, where trial court's error in not informing the jury that it had a right to request read back of testimony was harmless in view of defendant's confession and corroborating evidence. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Richmond v. Shasta Community Services Dist., C034239, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 5, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Development fee could be passed by ordinance or resolution as a property owner was not compelled to pay fee unless he elected to develop his property, and proposition did not limit local governments ability to impose such fees. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Ananda Church of Self-Realization v. Mass. Bay Ins. Co., No. C037158., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 6, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Lawsuits against insured arising out of the alleged wrongful taking of documents from the trash can of underlying plaintiff's attorney, did not raise a potential claim for "property damage" under insurer's general liability policy. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Harris v. Rudin, No. B142179., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, February 6, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: In a legal malpractice suit, the trial court erred in granting client's motion for summary judgment, defendants raised triable issues of fact as to whether they were entitled to rescind a settlement agreement based on a mutual mistake of fact. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Hernandez, B145238, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, February 6, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Overview: The trial court committed reversible error by removing a juror who stated that she had formed no opinion about the case and promised to remain fair and open-minded. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Smith v. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians, A093277, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 6, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Truck Ins. Exchange v. County of Los Angeles, B134182, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 6, 2002, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.