Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - February 14, 2006

  
Finkbeiner v. Gavid, No. B180104, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A successor trustee of a trust did not have to be represented by counsel when appearing in court to petition to modify and terminate the trust. By filing her petition to modify and terminate the trust, the trustee was simply fulfilling her duties.

Search Cases for Free

  
Kim v. Superior Court, B185850, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A complaint sufficiently alleged that defendant acted in furtherance of an agreement to engage in prostitution because it recounted a conversation between defendant and an officer, including her instruction that he undress. Words could be an act in furtherance of an agreement to engage in an act of prostitution under Pen. Code ? 647, subd. (b).

Search Cases for Free

  
Mayer v. L & B Real Estate, B180540, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a quiet title action arising from a tax sale, the trial court erred when it applied equitable tolling and estoppel to avoid the statute of limitations, Rev. & Tax. Code, ? 3725; the claimants had actual notice of every fact necessary to bring a timely action, and the buyer, as a bona fide purchaser, was not estopped by the tax collector's acts.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Espana, G035423, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Regardless of whether defendant remained incarcerated or had been released from prison, the express language of Pen. Code, ? 296.1, provided that if defendant's original DNA sample were expunged, he would have been required to submit a new sample as either an inmate or a parolee.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Noori, B181950 (Consolidated with B183383), COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, February 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendants' ignorance of the licensing requirement for transmission of money abroad was not an excuse for their violation of Fin. Code, ? 1823; the offense was a general intent crime, and the trial court did not err in excluding evidence that defendants' attorney had told them that their business was generally in compliance with state law.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top