Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - January 25, 2008

  
Bayer-Bel v. Litovsky, B197829, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 25, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a tort action arising from a head-on collision, an unlicensed driver's liability for noneconomic damages was several under Civ. Code, ? 1431.2, subd. (a), and was limited to the amount of fault allocated to her by the jury because the liability of defendant passenger for negligent entrustment was primary, not vicarious.

Search Cases for Free

  
County of San Bernardino v. Walsh, No. B185391, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 25, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Reyes, B196415, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 25, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Security National Guaranty, Inc. v. California Coastal Com., A114647, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 25, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: California Coastal Commission erred in designating an owner's property an environmentally sensitive habitat (ESHA) because California Coastal Act of 1976, Pub. Resources Code, ? 30000 et seq., granted the Commission no power to declare property an ESHA during a CDP appeal; Commission improperly assumed powers expressly reserved to local government.

Search Cases for Free

  
Verga v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., C055711, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 25, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Superior Court, A116116, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 25, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because a bank's alleged misrepresentations and omissions coincided with a security transaction, the broadly applicable "in connection with" requirement for the application of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998, 15 U.S.C. ? 78bb(f), was met, thereby precluding a state class action complaint by trust beneficiaries.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top