 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re JOSEPH M., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, B156747,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re KENDALL C., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, A097294,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re KENDALL C., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, A098054,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Abrams, C040855,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re SANTIAGO S., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, G030053,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re SHAKELA D., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, B158659,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jackson v. Gourley, No. A097940.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 28, 2003, Decided , January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly issued writ of mandate directing the DMV to accept certificates of completion from the high school and the student, as state statutes did not prohibit the high school from offering a correspondence driver education course.
|
|||||
| Mackey v. Department of Corrections, C040262,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the officers demonstrated unfair conduct in the workplace by virtue of the warden's preferential treatment of the staff members who were his paramours, they did not show a concerted pattern of sexual harassment or sexual discrimination.
|
|||||
| NICHOLAS v. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA DEP'T OF PLANNING & DEV., B160208,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 28, 2003, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
