 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ahmadi-Kashani v. Regents of the University of California, G038103,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State university employee's failure to complete the grievance process after attending an informal dispute resolution meeting did not bar her lawsuit under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act; because her participation in the grievance process did not include a quasi-judicial hearing, there were no findings to be accorded preclusive effect.
|
|||||
| Hall v. Time, Inc., G038040,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Marathon Entertainment, Inc. v. Blasi, S145428,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where actress's personal manager engaged in unlawful procurement of employment in violation of the California Talent Agencies Act, manager was not barred from any recovery of outstanding fees from actress. Doctrine of severability under Civ. Code, § 1599, could be applied to allow partial recovery of fees owed for legally provided services.
|
|||||
| Mariah T. v. Monique B., B198361,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dispositional order removing mother's children was proper because the dependency court could reasonably have found that mother's boyfriend would remain in her home, thus placing children at continued risk of sexual abuse pursuant to Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, subd. (a). Daughter alleged boyfriend had twice come to her bed and fondled her thigh.
|
|||||
| People v. Lopez, S143615,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the trial of Catholic priest for sex offenses involving teenagers, no misconduct occurred when the prosecutor commented that priests committed horrendous crimes, in the context of discussing how to assess credibility, because she did not argue guilt by association by linking defendant to highly publicized acts of sexual misconduct by priests.
|
|||||
| People v. Paredes, E040123,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Quihuis v. City of Los Angeles, B196367,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Personnel complaint that contained references to a provision of the city charter but did not identify any proposed disciplinary action did not give a police officer sufficient notice under Gov. Code, § 3304, subd. (d), that he might be discharged; the city was required to give notice of the specific disciplinary action that was being contemplated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
