 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Beck, F044669,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's attempted murder conviction was reversed, where the jury was improperly instructed with an instruction pertaining to implied malice; the instructional error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
| People v. Diaz, B170874,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: "Failure to yield" could not be one of the three traffic violations used to establish that an evasion of police was in "willful or wanton disregard" of safety because it was impossible to evade a pursuing police vehicle without also failing to yield.
|
|||||
| People v. Thoma, B170355,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a possession of methamphetamine case, defendant's silence during sentencing on a prior conviction regarding the victim's injuries was admissible as an adoptive admission of the truth of the sentencing court's description of those injuries.
|
|||||
| People v. Thurman, C044448,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court had discretion under Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 to impose condition of probation requiring defendant to waive his statutory right to any future custody credits for time spent in a residential drug treatment facility.
|
|||||
| QUINTINA G. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF TULARE COUNTY, F046631,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| ROMERO v. CITY OF COMMERCE, B165076,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| ROSE M. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, D045358,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| SINGH v. LIPWORTH, C044535,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| STRATHVALE HOLDINGS v. E.B.H., B169603,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 26, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
