 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| PERLA TY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EPSON AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents., B163328,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Adams, H024504,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not violate defendant's constitutional rights by not allowing him to present third party culpability evidence in defendant's murder trial. Trial court did not err in failing to suppress DNA evidence and in its jury instructions.
|
|||||
| People v. Bautista, H024442 H026395,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendants' convictions for possession of marijuana for sale were affirmed because a federal agent's use of a narcotics detection dog from the military to obtain a tip on where drugs were located did not constitute direct military involvement.
|
|||||
| People v. Brendlin, C040754,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence found on defendant, a passenger in a car during an investigatory stop, should have been suppressed, as the stop was illegal, based solely on an officer's hunch that the car's temporary license might have been switched from another car.
|
|||||
| People v. Partida, B161356,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where no gang enhancement was alleged, admission at defendant's murder trial of expert testimony regarding gangs that went beyond showing motive or intent was harmless error where there was sufficient other evidence to support the conviction.
|
|||||
| ROSA V., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Real Party in Interest., D043068,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| ROSSI v. FARIA, F043147,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rezec v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., B160586,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A special motion to strike a consumer protection action arising from a studio's use of a nonexistent movie critic in its advertisement was properly denied because the advertisements constituted commercial speech.
|
|||||
| SINA v. McLAUGHLIN, G030615,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 27, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
