 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| PEOPLE v. ROEHRICH, C041632,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. TANUZ, A103091,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. TINOCO, B161983,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. VENEGAS, E033527,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PILANI v. YALAMANCHILI, B154095, x-ref. B109321 c/w B116014,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Baldizan, C041963,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Keisner, A097252,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Lampron, C041946,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Willis, B160530,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2004, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Testimony at defendant's murder trial about dog scent identification and scent transfer units (STU) was improperly admitted, as handler was not a scientist; hence, he was unqualified to testify about STU or its acceptance in scientific community.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
