 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| PEOPLE v. QUIROZ, G034245,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. RECTOR, E035374,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. SQUYRES, C045955,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. TURLEY, A105105, A108085,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. VALLE, A102396,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. WASHINGTON, A100963,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. WEDERMYER, B173998,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. WHITE, B173738,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Parker v. McCaw, B167028,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 27, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where one agreement provided for arbitration before a single arbitrator and another provided for arbitration before a three-arbitrator panel, the trial court erred by resolving the conflicting arbitration provisions in favor of a single arbitrator.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
