 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| CLAY v. TELECARE CORP., B174879,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| CRUZAT v. SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCH. DIST., G033467,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Caira v. Offner, D042481,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found that majority shareholder was not entitled to jury trial on issues of ownership of common stock or equitable shareholder derivative claims, even though punitive damages were sought.
|
|||||
| City of Santa Monica v. Stewart, B159223, B160037, B162530, and B16479.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly dismissed declaratory judgment action. City lacked standing to challenge validity of an initiative that prevented city officials from receiving certain advantages from those who benefitted from officials' discretionary decisions.
|
|||||
| Cook v. City of Buena Park, G031326,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly struck down as unconstitutional city ordinance that obliged landlords to undertake eviction proceedings against all occupants of rental unit when chief of police suspected tenant had engaged in or permitted illegal drug activity.
|
|||||
| GRAHAM v. GRAHAM, B169542,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Andrew C., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, A106886,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re C. J., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, E035883,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re CHRISTOPHER C., Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, D043826,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
