Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - California - January 28, 2005
  
PEOPLE v. RIVERA, D044522, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. RUSSELL, D044171, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. SALAZAR, B174162, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. SAUNOA UTU PUA, G032526, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. SHAW, D042877, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. SILVERIO DASALLA CARRIDO, F045485, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. SPADE, A105918, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS, G032773, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
People v. Jones, H026920, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
People v. Poslof, E033503, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 28, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Conviction for failing to register as sex offender at second residence was proper, even if defendant stayed there less than five consecutive working days. Evidence was sufficient to support finding that defendant had actual knowledge of requirement.

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.