Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - January 29, 2004

  
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RONALD LESLIE ROCOLE, Defendant and Appellant., A101520, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SATURNINO CENTENO CORTEZ, Defendant and Appellant., G031185, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SAUL PADOBA, Defendant and Appellant., H025698, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SERGIO STUARDO MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant., A102472, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. STEVEN JOSEPH SANCHEZ, Defendant and Appellant., A101083, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TERRENCE PHILLIPS, Defendant and Appellant., A102618, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VAN-ALBERT K. SIEGRIST, Defendant and Appellant., A101374, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
TRUDE LEE ASH and COMERICA BANK-CALIFORNIA, Objectors and Respondents, v. HIRAM ASH, Objector and Appellant., B130513, B141349, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Vo v. City of Garden Grove, G032058, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 29, 2004, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: City ordinance requiring cybercafes to obtain conditional use permits was unconstitutional; however, other aspects of the ordinance, such as the imposition of a daytime curfew for minors and certain staffing requirements were constitutional.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top