 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bardin v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., G034590,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Consumer complaint alleging that a manufacturer used tubular steel in the exhaust manifolds of certain of its vehicles, instead of more durable and more expensive cast iron, failed to state a claim under California's unfair competition law, Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq., because no misrepresentations or other unfair conduct were alleged.
|
|||||
| Benavides v. State Farm General Ins. Co., B179028,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action based on the presence of mold in condominium units, a condominium unit owner could not recover against an insurer for the negligent handling of her additional living expense claim where there was no coverage under the terms of her policy.
|
|||||
| Excelsior College v. Board of Registered Nursing, C047824,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the California Board of Registered Nursing previously had accepted an out-of-state college's nursing program as equivalent to California's minimum requirements pursuant to Bus. & Prof. Code, § 2736, subd. (a)(2), the board had no duty to conduct prospective evaluations or to continue recognizing the college's nursing program as equivalent.
|
|||||
| Kim v. Superior Court, B185850,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| McCarthy v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., C049516,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Rusheen v. Cohen, S123203,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, February 23, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where abuse of process claim against attorney was based on the communicative act of filing allegedly false declarations of service to obtain a default judgment, postjudgment enforcement efforts, including the application for writ of execution and act of levying on property, were protected by the litigation privilege of Civ. Code, § 47, subd. (b).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
