 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ajida Techs. v. Roos Instruments, No. H020311.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment affirmed confirming arbitration award where the inclusion of a provision permitting an award of attorneys' fees in the event of future disputes over the award did not exceed the arbitrators' powers.
|
|||||
| In re Lesansky, No. S079499.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attempt to commit a lewd or lascivious act on a child 14 or 15 years of age and at least 10 years younger than the perpetrator was a felony involving moral turpitude for attorney discipline purposes.
|
|||||
| In re Paguirigan, No. S076968.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 1, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary disbarment statute mandated that petitioner was to be disbarred for felony forgery conviction which was done with intent to deceive and committed in the course of the practice of law.
|
|||||
| People v. Burgess, C032143,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 1, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentencing court did not err in imposing the 15 percent limitation on defendant's presentence custody credits. Briggs initiative did not bar legislative increase in punishment for first degree murder.
|
|||||
| Franklin v. Usx Corp., No. A091473.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in ruling that corporation was a successor in interest. Purchase agreement language was unambiguous and did not include assumption of contingent tort liabilities. There was no de facto merger.
|
|||||
| Nat'l City Police Officers' Ass'n v. City of Nat'l City, No. D035158.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under the terms of an agreement, the city should have included the pay incentives and differentials in calculating the amount paid in vacation buy backs. Vacation time, whether used or sold, should have been treated uniformly.
|
|||||
| People v. Vang, No. F030545.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported attempted murder convictions. Spraying occupied residence with bullets from high-powered assault rifles showed deliberate intent to take lives of its inhabitants; thus express malice was shown.
|
|||||
| Pichly v. Nortech Waste, C029714,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 2, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order denying employer's petition to compel arbitration was reversed. Arbitration agreement was not substantively unconscionable, as it was neither one-sided nor overly harsh.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
