 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anaya v. Superior Court, No. B136703.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Original tortfeasors in an accident were liable for damages for any injuries or death suffered by the victim on the way to the hospital, it was foreseeable that victim would require transportation to hospital after accident.
|
|||||
| In re Antonio R., No. G025423.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile probation order requiring defendant to stay out of Los Angeles County not impermissibly overbroad; as defendant involved in extensive criminal and gang activity, condition was consistent with rehabilitative purpose.
|
|||||
| In re Luisa Z., No. F033011.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: "Juvenile adjudication" was not a "criminal conviction" and therefore a juvenile could not be required to register as a narcotics offender when released from California Youth Authority.
|
|||||
| Kirby v. S. Cal. Edison Co., No. E023834.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where the parties were not, at the time the settlement agreement release was executed, parties to any pending litigation, defendants could not have employed summary procedures to determine the enforceability of that release.
|
|||||
| People v. Barba, G023877,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred by sentencing defendant to three concurrent 25-year-to-life terms under One Strike Law, since crimes took place on single occasion; sentence should have been one life term and two additional consecutive terms.
|
|||||
| People v. Mendoza, No. E025276.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial counsel's decision to voluntarily bring the priors out before the jury could be fairly characterized as a reasonable tactical choice designed to demonstrate defendant's candor and honesty with the jury.
|
|||||
| People v. O'Neal, No. F030228.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Jury was sufficiently instructed that it could not convict appellant unless it found appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|||||
| Wilner v. Sunset Life Ins. Co., No. B133804. No. B137561.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order sustaining demurrer to request for class certification reversed. Consumer alleged insurance company made false statements to induce consumers to cancel existing life insurance policies and buy company's policies.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
