 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bono v. David, A112099,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where plaintiff's defamation action against defendant did not involve the construction or application of any provision of a real property agreement, the mandatory mediation and arbitration clause of that agreement did not apply.
|
|||||
| People v. Merfield, No. B190093,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Offender's petition challenging an initial determination that he qualified as a mentally disordered offender was moot because it was filed after his one-year commitment pursuant to that determination had expired; under Pen. Code, § 2966, subd. (c), only a determination of current mental status could be disputed after an initial commitment expired.
|
|||||
| San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior Court, D049298,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Save Tara v. City of West Hollywood, B185656,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City failed to comply with Pub. Resources Code, § 21100, subd. (a), when it entered into two agreements to develop property before work on an environmental impact report commenced; there was enough information about the project to provide meaningful information for environmental assessment before the city entered into the agreements.
|
|||||
| Young v. McCoy, B189885,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, February 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trustee reasonably exercised her discretion in refusing to make payments from a discretionary trust while the beneficiary was incarcerated because his needs were being met in prison; hence, under Prob. Code, § 15305.5, subd. (c), the trustee could not be compelled to invade the assets of the trust in order to pay a restitution judgment creditor.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
