 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cal. v. Riverside County Superior Court, No. E025472.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The State owns groundwater in a regulatory sense, but it does not own it in a possessory, proprietary sense. Therefore, the "owned property exclusion," which normally applied to property owned by an insured was inapplicable.
|
|||||
| Centex Golden Construcution Co. v. Dale Tile Co., No. D030452.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Subcontractor that agreed to indemnify general for any claim arising from its work was liable for its share of settlement of owner's claims despite finding that subcontractor was not negligent.
|
|||||
| George v. County of San Luis Obispo, No. B125212.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, March 1, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A suit alleging wrongful eviction against a sheriff was properly dismissed where the sheriff executed an order and writ of possession to evict appellants from the lease that was rejected by the federal bankruptcy court.
|
|||||
| Patience v. Snyder, E022682,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 1, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Purported transferee of quitclaim deed did not take the property conveyed because deed was not deposited before transferor's death. Handing it to clerk was not deposit when other papers and fees were needed before recording.
|
|||||
| Etcheverry v. Tri-Ag Serv., No. S072524.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In tort case arising from lost crops, court of appeal erred when holding that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act did not preempt state law claims that alleged pesticide warning labels were inadequate.
|
|||||
| L.A. Alliance for Survival v. City of L.A., No. S073451.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An ordinance directed at activity involving public solicitation for immediate donation or payment of funds should not be considered content based or constitutionally suspect under the California Constitution.
|
|||||
| G. L. Mezzetta v. City of Am. Canyon, No. A085136.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court concluded that implicit in relevant statutory provisions was the requirement that contracts with defendant city be in writing, such that alleged oral contract between plaintiff and defendant was invalid.
|
|||||
| Jacobus v. Krambo Corp., No. A087995.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because employee was exonerated in sexual harassment suit that merely involved activities associated with normal social intercourse of modern office settings, employer was required to indemnify him for his defense fees.
|
|||||
| Lamont Storm Water Dist. v. Pavich, No. F031580.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: General grant of empowerment to storm water district did not specifically and clearly include grant of authority to abate alleged public nuisance and, absent such grant, district had no standing to bring abatement action.
|
|||||
| People v. Martin, No. F029478.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 3, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to jury instruction on the defense of voluntary intoxication for second degree murder because the statute precluded that defense to negate implied malice aforethought; statute was constitutional.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
