 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Collins Dev. Co. v. D.J. Plastering, No. D028673.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action on developer's cross-complaint against subcontractor, subcontractor had right to have issue of allocation of settlement between developer and original plaintiff decided by jury.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Hamer, No. A087332.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former wife could not waive collection of child and spousal support arrearages because statutes made the support obligation per se enforceable until paid in full, and not retroactively modifiable as to accrued arrearages or interest.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Superior Court, No. B137002.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Regarding efforts to compel compliance with deposition subpoena, the state's interest in discovering truth in legal proceedings allowed it to compel disclosure of confidential medical records regarding sperm donor.
|
|||||
| Keller v. Chowchilla Water Dist., No. F031112.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Water district's standby charge for purchasing water was imposed exclusively to finance district's maintenance and operation expenses and was exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in the California constitution.
|
|||||
| People v. Riel, No. S008005.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence enhancement was appropriate where defendant convicted of serious felony had prior conviction in another jurisdiction; defendant's actual out-of-jurisdiction crime constituted felony under law of jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Rick's Elec. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd., No. C032121.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported conclusion that electrical contractor willfully violated an occupational safety standard by directing an employee to work on circuitry without first testing to see if the circuit was energized.
|
|||||
| Tenet/Centinela Hosp. Medical Ctr. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. B133678.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where primary treating physician released claimant to return to work and prescribed no further doctor-involved treatment, claimant was required to comply with applicable regulations to change primary treating doctor.
|
|||||
| Walters v. Superior Court, No. G026062.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ex parte, confidential order permitting defense to perform ballistic test on weapon in police evidence locker violated discovery statute, so writ petition granted; locker contents were prosecution's responsibility to disclose.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. John Crane, No. A087001.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, May 18, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In plaintiffs' personal injury action against multiple defendants, each defendant was liable only for the amount of non-economic damages allocated to that defendant in direct proportion to that defendant's percentage of fault.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
