 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Rose, No. S062859.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Supreme Court of California is not required to hear oral argument or issue a written opinion before denying an attorney's petition for review of a decision recommending disbarment.
|
|||||
| Lane v. Hughes Aircraft Co., No. S059064.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's findings provided a sufficient basis for ordering a new trial as to liability, and appellate court failed to apply deferential standards of review applicable to review of an order granting a new trial.
|
|||||
| People v. Williams, No. B130417.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In spousal abuse case, peremptory challenges could not be used to exclude male jurors solely because of presumed group bias and battered woman syndrome testimony was admissible to explain victim's statements and actions.
|
|||||
| Butler v. Superior Court, No. H020240. No. H020554.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writs of mandate issued commanding dismissal of petitions for recommitment as sexually violent predators because two evaluations by separate psychologists or psychiatrists required rather than the one evaluation presented.
|
|||||
| People v. Turner, No. D033138.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's retrial for civil commitment pursuant to California Sexually Violent Predators Act was not barred by inability of jury in first trial to agree on verdict or finding that defendant was a sexually violent predator.
|
|||||
| Schnall v. Hertz Corp., No. A083939.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court reinstated plaintiff's unfair competition claim against car rental agency because the fuel service charge was not plainly clear from the rental agreement.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
