 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blue v. City of Los Angeles, B180319 consolidated w/B182624,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a validation action brought to challenge an amended community redevelopment plan, evidence of deteriorated or dilapidated buildings and depreciated or stagnant property values was sufficient under Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33030, subd. (b)(2)(A), 33031, subd. (a), to support findings of physical and economic blight.
|
|||||
| Campo Band of Mission Indians v. Superior Court, D046568,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although trial court had limited subject matter jurisdiction over casino patron's claim against Indian tribe because tribe's compact with State included a waiver of its tribal sovereign immunity relating to patron negligence claims up to specified limits, court erred in failing to submit regulation compliance issue for determination in arbitration.
|
|||||
| Garau v. Torrance Unified School Dist., B180683,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of order reclassifying appellants' case and transferring it to a limited jurisdiction department was dismissed because reclassification order was not appealable final judgment; party seeking appellate review of such an order had to file timely petition for writ of mandate pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 403.080, which appellants failed to do.
|
|||||
| Gober v. Ralphs Grocery Co., D040473,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a jury found that an employer failed to take reasonable steps to prevent a supervisor from sexually harassing several employees, a constitutionally excessive award of punitive damages was reduced to a 6-to-1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages, which was sufficient to punish the employer and was proportionate to the harm suffered.
|
|||||
| Hoskins v. Hogstad, C049379,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Fernando R., H028851,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Introduction of a robbery victim's statement that was the product of police interrogation and thus testimonial deprived defendant juvenile of his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation, where the victim was apparently unavailable to testify at trial and defendant had no opportunity to cross-examine her.
|
|||||
| Jacob B. v. County of Shasta, C049794,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A letter written by the supervisor of a county victim witness program that referred to a child molestation accusation against plaintiff juvenile was absolutely privileged under Civ. Code, § 47, subd. (b). The letter constituted a communication because it was made in the context of a judicial proceeding, i.e., a pending family law case.
|
|||||
| Kinsman v. Unocal Corp., S118561,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Matthew H., B181912,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, March 1, 2006, Decided , March 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
