 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Valley Advocates v. City of Fresno, F050952,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, February 15, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a city council was misinformed about its discretion whether to list two apartment buildings in the local register of historic resources for purposes of CEQA, it followed that the city council did not, in fact, exercise its discretion and make such an election. In not exercising its discretion, the city council abused its discretion.
|
|||||
| Whitlock v. Foster Wheeler, LLC, A117221,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, February 15, 2008, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not abuse its discretion by finding misconduct due to a juror's comments and that comments caused prejudice requiring new trial under Code Civ. Proc., ¿ 657, because juror interjected matters outside the scope of the trial and his misconduct related directly to whether a manufacturer was at fault in causing a sailor's mesothelioma.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
