 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Campbell v. Scripps Bank, No. D030864.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Prior judgment collaterally estopped breach of contract action because escrow agent's failure to get subordination agreement compliance caused no damages. Attorney fees were unavailable under escrow indemnification clause.
|
|||||
| In re Jasmine D., No. A086822.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of parental rights to allow adoption was affirmed. Mother failed to justify a plan less permanent than adoption by proving that her visitation relationship outweighed the benefit of adoptive placement.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Fogarty & Rasbeary, No. B124533.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father was entitled to laches defense against a 17-year-old child support order for mother where grandfather cared for child her entire life and told father, who maintained contact with child, monthly support was unnecessary.
|
|||||
| People v. Marquez, No. C029962.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When a defendant steals by force or fear more than one item during the course of an indivisible transaction involving a single victim, he commits only one robbery notwithstanding the number and ownership of items he steals.
|
|||||
| Pmc, Inc. v. Kadisha, No. B136095.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, March 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Personal liability may be imposed on a corporate shareholder, officer, or director who knows or has reason to know about tortious misappropriation and allows it to occur.
|
|||||
| Boicourt v. Amex Assurance Co., No. G021061.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 15, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of summary judgment in favor of insurance company on bad faith claim was reversed. Request for policy limits might have been a settlement opportunity which was foreclosed by appellee's refusal to contact policyholder.
|
|||||
| In re Kenny A., No. H020212.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 15, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant juvenile, sent to county jail after he was found in violation of drug statute, had received unauthorized disposition by juvenile court. Commitment to the county jail by juvenile court was not a statutory option.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
