 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Am. Airlines v. Sheppard, No. B123313.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Law firm and its attorney breached fiduciary duty to their client when attorney served as third party's designated deposition witness; client spent $ 8,174 in attorney fees to prevent attorney from serving as deposition witness.
|
|||||
| City of Chino v. Jackson, No. E028198.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In construction litigation, a developer's release from breach of contract liability did not excuse her obligation to indemnify her insured.
|
|||||
| Kimberly R. v. Superior Court, No. D039117.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A single instance of mother failing to pick up minor child from day care did not pose a substantial risk of harm to minor and therefore was not substantial evidence supporting removal of the child from mother's custody.
|
|||||
| Patel v. City of Gilroy, No. H021888.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a taxpayer's appeal of an assessment, the City of Gilroy, California's Transient Occupancy Tax ordinance withstood vagueness challenges.
|
|||||
| People v. Flores, B148379,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 8, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court remanded for hearing to determine defendant's ability to pay costs of his court-appointed counsel, where trial court failed within six months of conclusion of trial proceedings to give notice and conduct such a hearing.
|
|||||
| Winter v. City of L.A., No. B148898.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police officer's probationary period was not extended by his placement on inactive duty, therefore he was no longer a probationary employee when he was terminated, and therefore he was a tenured officer entitled to a board of rights hearing.
|
|||||
| People v. Mancebo, No. S086481.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 11, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant convicted of multiple instances of sexual assault was not subject to gun use sentencing enhancement; People already used fact that defendant committed offenses with gun to impose indeterminate terms under One Strike law.
|
|||||
| Padres Hacia Una Vida Mejor v. Davis, Nos. F036205, F037576, F037832, No. F037828.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: California law required the Governor to convene an administrative appeal board to review a county's approval of the conditional use permit concerning a hazardous waste project.
|
|||||
| People v. Moore, No. C036773.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 12, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a murder trial, the court did not err in refusing a request to instruct on the defense of mental disease, defendant elicited no expert testimony that he suffered from a mental disease, defect, or disorder at the time of the offense.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
