LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - March 18, 2009

  
321 Henderson Receivables Origination LLC v. Ramos, F056252, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred when it concluded that petitioners could not voluntarily dismiss their SSTA (Structured Settlement Transfer Act) petition without prejudice pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., ¿ 581, subd. (b). Factoring company's consent to the dismissal of the SSTA petition was not required because it was not a party to petitioners' action.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
321 Henderson Receivables Origination LLC. v. Tomahawk, F055879, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Transferee under the Structured Settlement Transfer Act, Ins. Code, ¿¿ 10136 et seq., was a plaintiff with a right to voluntary dismissal under Code Civ. Proc., ¿ 581, subd. (b)(1), because it was a party prosecuting a special proceeding as defined in Code Civ. Proc., ¿¿ 22, 23, and therefore was a plaintiff under Code Civ. Proc., ¿ 1063.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Alan S., Jr. v. Orange County Superior Court, G041034, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a child custody case, a pendente lite attorney fee order entered against a father and in favor of the mother failed to pass muster, even under an abuse of discretion standard of review because the trial court failed to consider the factors set forth in Fam. Code, ¿ 2030 & 2032.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc., H031127, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
David S. Karton, a Law Corp. v. Dougherty, B201663, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Franco v. Athens Disposal Co., Inc., B203317, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
International Assn. of Fire Fighters, Local 188, AFL-CIO v. Public Employment Relations Bd., A114959, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Public Employment Relations Board properly dismissed unfair labor practice charges relating to a layoff of 18 firefighters because a decision to lay off firefighters was not subject to negotiation under Gov. Code, ¿ 3504. Recasting layoff decision as a reduction in shift staffing did not transform it into a proper subject of collective bargaining.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Ramirez, S156775, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 18, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.