 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Blakeley, No. S062453.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A defendant who, with the intent to kill or with conscious disregard for life, unlawfully killed in unreasonable self-defense was guilty of voluntary manslaughter.
|
|||||
| People v. Lasko, No. S069354.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 2, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal of second degree murder conviction was denied; jury instruction that intent to kill was an essential element of the crime of voluntary manslaughter was erroneous, but harmless.
|
|||||
| Burden v. County of Santa Clara, No. H019329.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: County enjoyed tort immunity against a claim of common law fraud and statutory misrepresentation; claim of false representation concerning terms of employment involved financial interests and fell under the immunity statute.
|
|||||
| Cano v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. C032288.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's request for future cosmetic surgery was supported by substantial evidence, and the factual finding concerning cosmetic surgery was unsupported by California law.
|
|||||
| Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Prods. Co., No. S071934.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: California's unfair competition law permitted an order requiring an employer to disgorge wrongfully withheld wages.
|
|||||
| Kraus v. Trinity Management Servs., No. S064870.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Disgorgement into a fluid recovery fund was not available in unfair competition law action, where the action had not been certified as a class action.
|
|||||
| Nat'l Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. County of Riverside, No. D032228.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney fees awarded for challenging the new environmental impact report were reversed because the litigation did not help ensure compliance with a prior court order, or in any other way succeed in securing a public benefit.
|
|||||
| People v. Superior Court (Zamudio), No. S073031.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's failure to fully advise defendant as the possibility of his deportation as a consequence of his guilty plea was not a grounds for plea withdrawal.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
