 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Akins v. Enter. Rent-A-Car Co., No. A087975.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In its attorney fee award to plaintiffs, trial court did not abuse its discretion by not requiring from plaintiff a more formal apportionment of hours than that already provided by plaintiff in her motions for fees.
|
|||||
| In re Lukas B., No. B134685.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father's parental rights were properly terminated where it was shown that it was likely the children would be adopted and there was no overriding consideration that a guardianship was preferred over adoption.
|
|||||
| Kasky v. Nike, Inc., A086142,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 20, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In determining whether speech was commercial, relevant traits were whether materials were advertisements, referred to specific product, or were published with economic motivation. Public relations campaign was noncommercial.
|
|||||
| Paz v. Cal., No. S068742.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, March 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A contract for a public project did not create a general duty to third persons that gave rise to negligence liability, with respect to an allegedly dangerous condition the contract work may have corrected.
|
|||||
| People v. Gardineer, No. C032812.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment sentencing defendant for violating the conditions of his probation was affirmed; he waived any defect in the contested condition of probation because he failed to object to it when it was imposed.
|
|||||
| People v. Orellano, No. B131860.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 20, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Admission of evidence of prior similar sex offenses without cautionary instruction was error because the jury might infer guilt by less than the beyond a reasonable doubt standard.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
