Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - California - March 20, 2002
	Bustillos v. Murphy, No. D037559., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 20, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Trial court properly denied plaintiff a prescriptive easement to a network of trails on property owned by defendant on the basis that a statute barred his claim for an easement for recreational purposes. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	People v. Jackson, No. D037670., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 20, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Suppression motion ruling at the preliminary hearing was binding for purposes of trial; prosecution failed to invoke the "second bite at the apple," by timely requesting within 15 days after the preliminary hearing the de novo special hearing. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Vanzant v. Daimlerchrysler Corp., No. B149046., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, March 20, 2002, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Trial court properly sustained demurrer on plaintiff's complaint for malicious prosecution; because underlying action was supported by probable cause, then probable cause existed for continuation of the same action after reversal on appeal. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.