 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Ivan J., No. B142656.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, March 28, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant committed the crime of falsely identifying himself to a peace officer when he lied about his date of birth.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Egedi, No. B140733.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, March 28, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a single attorney obtained an informed written waiver of the potential conflict of interest and acted only as a scrivener of the parties' marital settlement agreement, the agreement was enforceable.
|
|||||
| People v. Castro, E026619,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 28, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a criminal matter, defendant was not barred from being subject to a second trial for the same offense; legal necessity required a mistrial.
|
|||||
| People v. Hoffman, No. G026965.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 28, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant waived his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence by failing to renew his suppression motion before the trial judge.
|
|||||
| People v. Kurey, No. B141119.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 28, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's order finding that defendant committed a probation violation by violating possession of child pornography law was affirmed. Evidence was sufficient to establish that defendant knew actors depicted were minors.
|
|||||
| People v. Salgado, No. B134841.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, March 28, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: On review of a criminal matter, the appellate court reversed the order dismissing the jury's verdict finding defendant guilty of carjacking on the basis of insufficiency of evidence.
|
|||||
| People v. Sandoval, No. C030917.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 28, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: To comply with requirements of the Confrontation Clause, prosecution was required to show due diligence in securing Mexican witness's attendance at trial, before using that witness's preliminary hearing testimony at trial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
