 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| H. D. Arnaiz v. County of San Joaquin, No. C035433.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order granting a motion to vacate a voluntary dismissal was not an appealable order.
|
|||||
| Harris v. Sandro, No. B148018.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's appeal of a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of defendants was frivolous; appellate court imposed sanctions to discourage plaintiff and appellate counsel from further frivolous litigation.
|
|||||
| Hassan v. Mercy American River Hospital, C026448,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 21, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: California law extended a privilege to an allegedly libelous communication of information to a hospital, as the communication was intended to aid in the evaluation of the qualifications of a medical practitioner.
|
|||||
| In re Robert H., No. B152012.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a juvenile delinquency proceeding, the trial court properly exercised its discretion by concluding the minor should be committed to camp community placement; it was to the minor's benefit.
|
|||||
| Low v. Lan, No. G023366.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurance Commissioner's preference claim against an insurance claimant was timely; California law provided a three-year statute of limitations for such claims.
|
|||||
| People v. McNeil, No. A093287.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Police could not show good faith reliance on Oakland ordinance used as the basis to arrest and search defendant, where the ordinance was preempted by California state law for over 40 years.
|
|||||
| Tradewinds Escrow v. Truck Ins. Exch., No. B145867.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Insurer had no duty to indemnify where all of the claims alleged in the underlying action against insured were committed during the performance of professional services; policy also excluded insured's intentional conduct or acts.
|
|||||
| Wang v. Massey Chevrolet, No. B147471.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, March 21, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Oral misrepresentations in connection with a consumer transaction were prohibited by the Consumers Legal Remedies Act; the parol evidence rule was not a defense.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
