 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gee v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. F038425.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where claimant was awarded workers' compensation benefits relating to her two cumulative injuries and nothing for her alleged specific injury, board erred by not weighing the medical evidence in light of the treating physician's presumption.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Rassier, No. B145310.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, March 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: California trial court was precluded from modifying or terminating a Florida spousal support order, even though neither party resided in Florida; court in Florida had continuing and exclusive jurisdiction to modify or terminate obligation.
|
|||||
| People v. Arroyas, No. B147995.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, March 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Vandalism, as a crime against the public, was treatable as a felony for sentencing purposes at the judge's discretion.
|
|||||
| People v. Black, F033914, F038143,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 22, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was staying in codefendant's apartment, and they were both arrested on drug charges, defendant's probation status could not be used to validate search as to codefendant, and codefendant had reasonable expectation of privacy.
|
|||||
| People v. Turner, No. C037315.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court had no discretion to refuse to impose a laboratory analysis fee and related penalty assessments on defendant, appellate court modified the judgment to impose them.
|
|||||
| Renee J. v. Superior Court, No. G029791.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 22, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court terminated the reunification services of mother with her daughter, the trial court erred in applying state supreme court's interpretation of statute, since legislature overrode that interpretation by amending statute.
|
|||||
| Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarche, B146708,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, March 25, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A malicious prosecution complaint was subject to a special motion to strike; plaintiff's cause of action arose out of attorney's free speech actions.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
