 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ball v. Gte Mobilnet, No. C031783.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, June 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Claims of unfair business practices against cell phone companies were preempted by federal communications law, but plaintiff could claim non-disclosure of charges under state law, and tariff violations pre-dating federal law.
|
|||||
| Boysaw v. Superior Court, No. S080174.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order adjudging an attorney in contempt of court was annulled for failure to reference an appropriate warning.
|
|||||
| Culligan v. State Comp. Insurance Fund, No. A085913.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, June 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given policy language, context, and kinds of risks covered, employee's action against employer raised no claims potentially within employer's liability coverage. Workers' compensation exclusion foreclosed potential for coverage.
|
|||||
| Hornung v. Superior Court, No. D034993.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, June 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court's grant of subpoena for testimony of commissioners of board of prison terms violated separation of powers doctrine; thus petition for writ of mandate was granted and inmates' subpoenas were quashed.
|
|||||
| In re Cliffton B., No. G025902.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, June 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order terminating parental rights affirmed. Sibling visitation order reversed and remanded to juvenile court for new hearing on post-termination sibling contact. At that hearing, each brother was represented by independent counsel.
|
|||||
| People v. Ayala, No. S009108.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, June 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Imposition of the death penalty following a murder conviction was affirmed because defendant was not denied a fair trial.
|
|||||
| People v. Brewer, No. B132056.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, June 8, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Noncoercive statements obtained in violation of Miranda due to a failure to admonish a suspect may be used to obtain a search warrant or to establish voluntary consent to a search at a pretrial suppression hearing.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
