 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Centennial Ins. Co. v. United States Fire Ins. Co., No. A090305.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insurer challenged method used by trial court to apportion parties' respective defense costs accrued in defending mutual insured in underlying suit, court did not err in using time on the risk method to allocate costs.
|
|||||
| Hambarian v. Superior Court, G026447,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reasonable possibility existed district attorney's office could not exercise its discretionary function in an evenhanded manner when victim extensively financed prosecution, but there was not likelihood defendant would not receive fair trial.
|
|||||
| In re Dennis H., No. A089641.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 30, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported juvenile court's finding that father was not denied effective assistance of counsel; although district attorney should not have participated in dependency case, father did not show the outcome would be more favorable.
|
|||||
| Katzberg v. Regents of Univ. of California, C035456,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 30, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Terminated department chair had no right to recover damages for violation of due process right to name-clearing hearing. Court properly sustained demurrer to contract claim since public employment was not held by contract but by statute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
