Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - March 7 - March 10, 2008

  
Goodman v. Lozano, G036774, G037091, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 7, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Brandon G., B196011, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 7, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence supported allegation that defendant juvenile possessed live ammunition in violation of Pen. Code, ? 12101, subd. (b)(1), where police officer who established he had training and experience in handling and recognition of guns and ammunition stated his opinion that shotgun shell he found in defendant's shotgun was a live round.

Search Cases for Free

  
In re G.S.R., B197000, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, March 7, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Rachel L., B192878, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 7, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Titan Electric Corp. v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist. & Kemp Bros. Construction, Inc. , B194748, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 7, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., D045154, D045579, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an action arising from a vehicle rollover, manufacturer forfeited a Due Process Clause challenge to jury's use of punitive damages to punish for harm to third parties because the manufacturer's proposed instruction on that issue incorrectly said that jury could not consider third party harm for any purpose, including assessing reprehensibility.

Search Cases for Free

  
Dominguez v. American Suzuki Motor Corp., G038373, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. McGowan, C054075, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a sexual assault case, CALCRIM No. 362 was not an improper pinpoint instruction; the trial court properly left it for the jury to determine whether defendant's inconsistent statements to a police officer regarding the victim's presence at his house were false or deliberately misleading, and if so, what weight should be given to that evidence.

Search Cases for Free

  
Zagami, Inc. v. James A. Crone, Inc., D049563, D050090, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 10, 2008, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a breach of contract action brought by a rental company against a construction project manager, a judgment in favor of the rental company entered on a special verdict was reversed as to damages, where the damages findings in the special verdict were hopelessly ambiguous.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top