 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cal. Med. Ass'n v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., No. B135863.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An injunction preventing a state university from restricting practice at new facility to faculty members was reversed; school could compete with private physicians without acting inconsistently with its statutory mandate.
|
|||||
| Families Unafraid to Uphold Rural El Dorado County v. Bd. of Supervisors, No. C031681.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Private attorney general doctrine provided attorneys' fees for prevailing plaintiffs whose financial burden was out of proportion to their financial and non-financial stake in pursuing litigation conferring public benefit.
|
|||||
| Guess?, Inc. v. Superior Court, No. B136531.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant failed to offer explanation for decision to defer its demand for arbitration for three months, and had not pled it as an affirmative defense. This was inconsistent with the later assertion of a right to arbitrate.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Cutler, No. F031759.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under relevant statute, child support arrearages were collectible until paid, and respondent could not assert lack of diligence or laches as defenses, so judgment holding appellant barred from collection was reversed.
|
|||||
| People v. Smithson, No. C030093, No. C030715.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court not required to conduct full hearing on motion to exclude confession where magistrate had already held such a hearing, and court lacked authority to double life-without-parole sentence due to prior felony conviction.
|
|||||
| Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc., A080316,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 29, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Smith v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. A083825.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, March 29, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No substantial evidence that petitioner intended to injure himself when he punched wall during argument with superior so workers' compensation benefits were available; Cal. Lab. Code ¿ 3600 (a)(5) was not applicable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
