 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Machado v. Superior Court, C052442,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order in a previous case disqualifying petitioner's current counsel was final and precluded relitigation of the issue it decided, namely that petitioner's current counsel's prior legal and business relationships with a nonparty called for current counsel's disqualification in the current dispute.
|
|||||
| People v. Burch, D049604,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although the use of CALJIC No. 2.02 would have been preferable regarding defendant's possession of fictitious bills because the element of specific intent substantially relied on circumstantial evidence, there was no prejudicial error because CALJIC No. 2.01 was a more inclusive instruction and would not have been misunderstood by the jury.
|
|||||
| Porter v. Superior Court, No. H029884,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's attempt to retry premeditation allegations and gang enhancement allegations on which trial court granted a new trial after the jury had convicted defendant as charged was barred by Pen. Code, § 1023, and by Apprendi because State was seeking second convictions for the same offenses, a proceeding ordinarily barred under Due Process Clause.
|
|||||
| Wright v. Issak, H030399,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 20, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a contractor underreported his payroll and consequently did not have workers' compensation insurance, his contractor's license was automatically suspended by operation of Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7125.2, and the trial court correctly applied Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7031, to find for the homeowners in a dispute over a home remodeling job.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
