Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - California - March 29, 2006
	California Ins. Guarantee Assn. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. B180525, No. B183529, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION EIGHT, March 29, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Californians for Fair RepresentationNo on 77 v. Superior Court, C051100, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 29, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Because campaign expenditures for advertising were made in connection with a communication that expressly advocated the passage of clearly identified ballot measures and were not made at the behest of a candidate or committee, the expenditures met the statutory definition of an independent expenditure in Gov. Code, ¿ 82031, and had to be reported. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Harris v. Investor's Business Daily, Inc. , B178428, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 29, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Because a single cause of action brought by telemarketers alleging violations of the FLSA under Bus. & Prof. Code, ¿ 17200 was not preempted by the FLSA's opt-in requirement, the trial court erred in sustaining defendants' demurrer to the ¿ 17200 cause of action. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In re Marriage of Kieturakis, A101719, A104661, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, March 29, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: In a case involving a marital settlement agreement favoring husband, presumption of undue influence did not apply because: (1) the agreement was reached through mediation; (2) the influence was alleged on a judgment long final; and (3) the parties acknowledged in the agreement that no undue influence was exercised, and capacity was not in question. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In re Needles Cases, H028246, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 29, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Thornburg v. Superior Court, D045247, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 29, 2006, Filed View this case - free   Overview: Trial court erred in sustaining a demurrer to a complaint alleging that a hospital's agent violated Evid. Code, ¿ 1158, by charging an excessive amount for copies of medical records; the agent could be liable if it had assumed the duty of responding to ¿ 1158 requests and if it acted in part for its own advantage and benefit. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us   Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.