Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - March 21, 2007

  
Carter v. Escondido Union High School Dist., D046833, D047649, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a case in which teacher had informed athletic director that football coach had recommended nutritional supplement to student, Ed. Code, ? 49423, could not form basis for teacher's wrongful termination action; statute did establish fundamental and well-established public policy against teachers recommending weight-gaining substances to students.

Search Cases for Free

  
Conservatorship of Tian L., D049033, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a case in which the trial court reestablished a conservatorship pursuant to the California Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, the conservatee's due process rights were adequately protected, where the conservatee received a copy of the petition for reestablishment and at least two written notices of her right to a hearing and a jury trial.

Search Cases for Free

  
Diablo Valley College Faculty Senate v. Contra Costa Community College Dist., A108713, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The Chancellor of the California Community Colleges properly found that a community college district was not required to consult with community college's academic senate before implementing an administrative reorganization because Cal. Code Regs., tit. 5, ? 53200, subd. (c)(6), did not require collegial consultation for management reorganizations.

Search Cases for Free

  
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. NAK Sealing Technologies Corp., C050813, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Substantial evidence supported the trial court's conclusion that a seller of oil seals breached the implied warranty of merchantability under Cal. U. Com. Code, ? 2314, subd. (1), by providing seals that contained an abrasive material and caused damage to machines in which the buyer's customer installed them.

Search Cases for Free

  
Golden Eagle Ins. Corp. v. Cen-Fed, Ltd., B179851, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Commercial general liability insurer owed neither a defense nor an obligation to indemnify the insured for damages awarded against it in an underlying action for breach of a commercial lease because the underlying complaint asserted only economic loss, not property damage, and the personal injury coverage was limited to claims by natural persons.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Brown, D047721, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because defendant's acts of attempted murder, attempted robbery, and assault with a deadly weapon did not arise from a single objective, the trial court did not violate the double-punishment prohibition contained in Pen. Code, ? 654, when it imposed sentences on the convictions arising from those acts.

Search Cases for Free

  
Van Horn v. Watson, B188076, B189254, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a personal injury action arising from a single-car accident, the immunity provision of Health & Saf. Code, ? 1799.102, did not apply to a friend who pulled a passenger from the car, purportedly fearing that it would catch fire or blow up, because the risk was not medical; ? 1799.102 applied only to the rendition of emergency medical care.

Search Cases for Free

  
Zenith Ins. Co. v. O'Connor, B184684, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: General circumstances of a reinsurance contract under Ins. Code, ? 620, did not create an attorney-client relationship between the ceding insurer's counsel and the reinsurer or a duty of care running to the reinsurer; hence, the trial court did not err in granting the law firm's demurrer in a professional negligence action brought by the reinsurer.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top