 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Avant! Corp. v. Superior Court, No. H019847.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court upheld an order denying stay of proceedings or discovery in respondent's defamation suit pending the outcome of a related criminal case since petitioner corporation's employees' Fifth Amendment privilege was protected.
|
|||||
| Curtis F. v. Superior Court, No. C034782.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for reunification was denied, because the reports of two psychologists provided substantial evidence for the juvenile court to conclude that father was not capable of caring for his child, due to a mental disability.
|
|||||
| People v. Douglas, No. B110243.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, April 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The reduction of defendant's crime to a misdemeanor was affirmed on appeal, as the trial court correctly determined that statute was a "wobbler" rather than a straight felony when the amount exceeded $ 400.
|
|||||
| People v. Martinez, No. S064558.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, April 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Filing of felony complaint was insufficient to invoke federal right to speedy trial, and absent statutory speedy trial violation, specific prejudice was required to show violation of California's right to speedy trial.
|
|||||
| People v. Waidla, No. S020161.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, April 6, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and death sentence were affirmed as the court found no prejudice, no error, and no abuse of discretion. All findings and conclusions were supported by substantial evidence in the record.
|
|||||
| In re Devon C., No. B133690.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, April 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile defendant's failure to wear a bicycle helmet, in violation of California law, provided the necessary basis for police stopping defendant, and a weapon found on defendant was admissible.
|
|||||
| Kuns v. City of Ukiah, A087470,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 7, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs won reversal in wrongful death action against defendant utility company, because there remained a triable issue of fact of whether defendant's acts were a substantial factor in fire that killed four children.
|
|||||
| People v. Green, No. A086488.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, April 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because of compelling interest in protecting public from sexually violent predators (SVP) and SVP commitment took place after criminal proceedings were completed, SVP Act did not violate equal protection principles.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
