|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - April 3 - April 4, 2006
|
| |
People v. Markley, D045682,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, April 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a stalking case, where defendant, an indigent, failed to make an adequate showing of need for a transcript of the victim's trial testimony in a previous prosecution of defendant for stalking the same victim, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to order the transcript in the case.
|
|
| |
Weinstein v. Department of Transportation, H028124,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a case involving a cross-median collision on a highway, Caltrans was not liable under Gov. Code, ? 835, subd. (b), for plaintiffs' injuries because there was no substance to the claim that the signage at the accident location did not comply with applicable standards. The standard upon which plaintiffs relied did not require a median side sign.
|
|
| |
People v. Gonzalez, H028212,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, April 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although the People, relying on Pen. Code, ? 2900.5, subd. (b), and cases establishing rule of strict causation, argued defendant was entitled to custody credit only if auto theft and gun possession case was sole reason for his presentence confinement, rule did not apply, as defendant's custody could be attributed to multiple, unrelated causes.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback